00:00Hello, we also had a debate here about the questionable permit granted by the JEPA
00:05to the former FARC commander Rodrigo Londoño. Do you recognize him correctly? Or do you need
00:11What was his alias from when he was in armed rebellion, Timochenko, so we can locate him?
00:16That was the question that got us debating here. Not the JEPA's questionable permit.
00:22to the convicted man, nor to the also highly questionable announcement by the president-elect
00:28to find ways to tear the peace process to shreds. Our reflections were sparked by the title
00:37That was the initial headline we gave to the news story about Londoño's permission to travel to Spain.
00:44Despite the initial sentence, Rodrigo Londoño, alias Timochenko, left the country with authorization from the JEPA.
00:52The title was factually impeccable. It had all the necessary information. The doubt
00:58I was wondering if it was necessary, so many years after having laid down my arms and being
01:04In compliance with the agreement, he will continue to use the alias from his time in the war.
01:10And I confess that it was I who thought it was wrong to continue identifying him as alias Timochenko,
01:15Well, it was, in a way, ignoring the agreement. That was his nom de guerre, which he used ten years ago.
01:22He promised to leave. And that's why I changed the title to just EXFAR Rodrigo Londoño. I understood.
01:28Of course, Rodrigo Londoño doesn't mean much to many people, but he didn't fit in the previously known title.
01:35like some similar formula. However, there were valid reasons against making that change,
01:43precisely because not many people read Rodrigo Londoño and know who is being talked about.
01:50I also confess that I was left with some doubt, because as I said at the beginning, the title was
01:55formally impeccable and anyway I did identify him as Rodrigo Londoño and in fact
02:02An alias isn't necessarily a crime or used only by criminals. But what do you think?
02:13Did we see, starting with a "Pull on the Ears" from @ Mario Roberto P? Regarding the report of various
02:19institutional reactions to the dispute over less-than-institutional statements,
02:25Incidentally, from President Petro and former candidate Cepeda, but also from the president
02:31elected from Espriella. And that was basically the Ear Pull, which although the call was for the
02:37Three, because we only included the official party in the title and the photo,
02:43with Petro and Cepeda. He hadn't paid much attention to good old Mario Roberto lately because he's been off...
02:49not very obsessed with a columnist who has been with the newspaper for many decades, a newspaper he wants us to silence,
02:56But this time he completely agreed with his reprimand, among other things because it seemed to me that
03:02We fell into the same trap in another article, this time regarding the manifesto issued by a group from the center.
03:08of leaders and that, although it also sends messages to the powerful of the last four
03:15years like the next four, because we used the same photo again and also put on
03:21The title only mentions Petro and Cepeda. I must tell you that in both cases the messages were primarily
03:27towards the attitude of Petro and Cepeda, but it is true that they were not exclusively for them and that
03:33It should have been clear from the title. But let's get to the mess that's no longer ours.
03:39interpretations, which are less interesting to me, but which I know you might like.
03:45Moreover, because sometimes we don't even realize what we're writing. Like this week when we were collecting the
03:51First statements from the incoming Minister of Justice, Iván Cancino, where after so much repetition in
03:57These days, President-elect Abelardo de la Estrella or Vice President-elect José Manuel
04:02Restrepo, because we ended up adopting the elected one for the entire government and, strictly speaking, the only ones
04:09Those two were the ones elected. That's why Juan Malillo was absolutely right in his "ears" comment.
04:15When asked why we were talking about the Minister of Justice-elect, let's just say yes, he was chosen from the
04:23Espriella, but that doesn't hold water as an excuse. Juan Malillo, you're absolutely right, appointing him was the appropriate thing to do.
04:30Designated, yes, but not assigned, as we put in a social media infographic. Don explained it well.
04:37Jairo Alberto García, in his position of authority, the position is assigned to a person and the person is appointed.
04:44for a position. No appointed ministers. And to continue with our blunders with the
04:49ministers or this time actually with a former minister, Rivan Cuervo, also Don Jairo Alberto caught us
04:56A prominent minute in the printed version. It's the last one, or rather, the last two, because there are two in this.
05:03These are such electronic times when we no longer review paper evidence, because it is particularly
05:09It's difficult to proofread the text in cartoons, which doesn't always display well on screens.
05:16Well, this week we saw not one but two spelling errors in cartoons. One
05:21peacefully from Zuleta with an S and a caravan from Laché with a B for Burra. And in the printed word
05:29They're now part of history. This week's section was a bit long, sorry. See you next time.
05:54Thank you!
