Skip to playerSkip to main content
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) has concluded its public inquiry into an incident at Taiping Prison in January 2025, and found that excessive force, delayed medical treatment, negligence by prison personnel, and other human rights violations were inflicted upon over 100 inmates and had directly contributed to the death of Gan Chin Eng. On this episode of #ConsiderThis Melisa Idris speaks with Shashi Devan, Director of SUARAM and lawyer representing the families of the detainees.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:10Hi, welcome back to Consider This. I'm Melissa Idris. Let's continue our look into the human
00:16rights violations that happened during and after an incident at Taipei Prison on the 17th of January
00:23in 2025 which involved the use of excessive force against over a hundred inmates and directly
00:31resulted in the death of Gan Chin Eng who was a High Court detainee. Now joining me on the show
00:37today is Sashi Devon who is Director of Suwaram and also a lawyer representing the families of
00:44the detainees. Sashi, thank you so much for being back on the show. It's good to have you back.
00:48Can you first begin by telling me your response? You've read the Suhakam Inquiry Report. You were
00:54part of the Observer for Suwaram. So what has been your response to the Public Inquiry Report?
01:02Thank you Melissa. Thank you for having me again. Now firstly, we were part of the observing team
01:11for the family members at Suwaram was of course present because it was a public inquiry but
01:18we were representing the family members in that capacity. But with regards to the report, the
01:25inquiry report, now it has provided a comprehensive coverage of the systemic human rights violations.
01:33The report heavily accounted for and adopted the extensive submissions presented by us as
01:41Council for the family and the Malaysian Bar which covered misuse of weapons, leadership failures,
01:49dilapidated infrastructure among others. Now we, I must say, we must look into or try to understand the
01:58prison department's submissions, Melissa. Now they have from the beginning taken a very objective approach,
02:08I must say, and they in fact in their submissions conceded the use of false and inhumane treatment by
02:14its officers. That has been their position from the get-go. However, Suhakam called the incident for
02:22what it was. It was in fact torture and ill treatment and we cannot couch it in any other
02:31terms. It is torture and ill treatment. Now the report contains textual descriptions of the torture that
02:38was depicted in the CCTV footage. Now having watched in horror the footage of the incident during the
02:45inquiry, I have to say that what took place was nothing short of barbaric. Now I believe that it was
02:53a public
02:54inquiry, Melissa, but the CCTV footage was not made public. I must mention that it was never made public.
03:03Perhaps the panel had good reasons for not making it public and although my position or the position of
03:13family council has always been that we should make it public, I then left it to the wisdom of the
03:20panel to
03:21not make it public. But then during the inquiry, the observers and the panel, we had sight of or we
03:29were
03:29able to view what had actually taken place. Now in the current context where the CCTV footage remains
03:39withheld from public, the descriptions that were given in the report are vital because it gives the
03:45public a clear sense of the skill and brutality of the violence that actually took place in Taiping prison
03:52that day. In the case of the deceased, Mr Gan Jin Eng, we call him affectionately, we call him Uncle
04:00Gan, right?
04:01So Uncle Gan, he was shoved, beaten with the chota. What we refer to as the chota is actually a
04:09beaten
04:09person and kicked while exiting this hall. Now, this description is crucial in giving significance to
04:18understand what this old man went through during the incident that led to his unfortunate death.
04:26Now, I would have preferred, in terms of betterment of the report, I would have preferred for Suha come to
04:33take the view
04:34that Uncle Gan had actually passed away even before he left the prison grounds.
04:39Now, the severity of injuries from the assault, compounded by the protected delay in access to
04:45medical treatment and medical incompetence, played a significant role in contributing or expediting
04:52Uncle Gan's death. Now, we, the lawyers for the family, we are firmly of the opinion, Melissa,
04:58that Uncle Gan did not die in the hospital. He actually passed on within the compounds of the
05:06prison. On a balance of probabilities and the way in which the prison staff were giving unreliable
05:14evidence, it may appear that Uncle Gan had already succumbed to his injuries at the prison entrance itself
05:21while waiting to be taken to the hospital. We must remember, the ambulance never came. They actually
05:29had to take Uncle Gan to hospital via a prison van that arrived 30 minutes, 35 minutes later actually.
05:35So, um, another glaring omission is that the officer who was charged for, um, uh, in court for, um,
05:50sorry, um, the officer was charged for, uh, not murder but causing homicide, culpable homicide,
05:58amounting to murder. Um, he was the only, not amounting to murder, sorry, not amounting to murder,
06:03he was the only individual who was charged. And, uh, he was not produced as a witness at the inquiry.
06:10But this, the report does not cover. The individual who was subsequently charged in court was never
06:17produced at the inquiry. Now, this means that during the Suhaqam's investigation, they, while they may have
06:26identified this individual, Mr. Ryan D. O'Neill Victor as one of the witnesses, Suhaqam did not find that
06:36witness to be material enough to be produced, um, in the course of the inquiry. However, PDRM, through its
06:44investigations, found that he was the sole cause or the sole, uh, uh, individual that caused, may have
06:53caused Uncle Gunn's death. Okay. Okay. Sashi, how do you make sense of this discrepancy? What is,
06:59what is your hypothesis? What do you think is behind it? Well, um, to put it simply, I feel that,
07:05um,
07:06someone had to take the fall. They had to, uh, uh, some action had to be taken and they chose
07:12someone
07:13who was junior, um, who's not, uh, a resident in Semenanjung and basically charged the individual.
07:20Are we saying that after what we, what we have read from the report, we have seen almost 50 to
07:2760
07:28officers who have perpetrated this horrific, uh, uh, uh, conduct and only one individual was charged
07:36for Uncle Gunn's death? What happened to the other, uh, uh, offenses that may have, uh, that the other
07:43officers may have committed under Section 323 for causing harm, causing grievous harm, uh, uh, causing injury
07:50with weapons. What about all that? Nothing, zero investigation on, or they, uh, in the inquiry,
07:56we learned that some investigation did take place, but no one was charged for those offenses. We also
08:02learned that no disciplinary action was taken against any one of them in the cause of the inquiry. So
08:09where does that leave this one individual from nowhere, plucked out of nowhere, never called during
08:15the inquiry, suddenly ends up being charged in court. Is this, uh, could we then properly refer to him as
08:23a scapegoat? It's a question because I don't know. We must accord the presumption of innocence. Um, and he
08:31must be able to mount his defense. Right. What, what then, uh, uh, what can I say then of, uh,
08:39Swakam's
08:39investigation that led to the inquiry and that of PDRN? Were there any form of interference? These are
08:45questions that, um, that have not really been, uh, addressed. So, so now I have to ask you what it
08:52is
08:53you'd like to see happen next. Okay. All right. With regards to actions, um, firstly, uh, I, I would
09:02like to inform that Uncle Gun's family, we have filed, uh, a pretrial discovery application, uh, to request
09:09for, uh, the CCTV recording. Now, of course, in the application, we are saying that, um, we are not asking
09:17for it to be viewed in public or to be shown to the public, but we are asking that in
09:23the hopes of
09:24accountability, we will, we are permitted to screen the recording to key stakeholders, such as members
09:29of parliament, civil society groups, and the, uh, for the Malaysian part to actually have a copy
09:36so that we can now go to parliament and lobby the parliamentarians to seek for, um, many things.
09:44Number one, we want timelines. We want the government to tell us for all the recommendations that have
09:51been stated in the SOACAM report. What are the actions that you're going to take and what are
09:55the timelines that you're going to complete these, uh, uh, actions? How are you going to improve the
10:02system? Because what has happened here is a systemic failure that has led to the torture and ill treatment.
10:09Then the government should immediately ratify the UNCAD, the United Nations Convention Against
10:15Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment. That is something that has to be done
10:20immediately. Uh, this is something that SWARAM has been, uh, uh, seeking for years now, but, uh, the
10:28government has not come to it yet, but I hope that this incident and the SWACAM report, which is really
10:34comprehensive, actually brings to light the need for the immediate ratification. Now, with the
10:42parliamentary seating schedule from, if I'm not mistaken, it's sometime in June, between June and
10:46July, mid June to July, the public has a vital window to build public pressure for reform. Now, reach out
10:55to their local MP demand that they raise questions in parliament, uh, uh, liars with key stakeholders,
11:03um, mainly, uh, the whole ministry and the prime minister. We've always been trying to speak
11:08directly to the prime minister to tell him that, you know, things have to, to move on, on matters,
11:14urgent matters such as this. And, um, yes, we would also like to ask for, uh, the status of the
11:22disciplinary actions and the criminal actions to be, uh, taken more seriously. We would ask the,
11:30uh, well, members of parliament to inquire into the status of the investigations of the others,
11:38the other officers who were involved in all of this. Now, I want to say the other officers who were
11:44involved, they were senior officers, senior, uh, uh, officers of, uh, the prison's department who need to
11:52be held accountable to. All right. Sashi, thank you so much for being on the show with me today.
11:56I appreciate your time. Unfortunately, we've ran out of time. That was Sashi Devon from Suwaram
12:00wrapping up this episode of Consider This. I'm Melissa Idris, signing off for the evening.
12:04Thank you so much for watching and good night.
12:16We'll see you then.
Comments

Recommended