00:00What I posted was, it was a statement about the law system.
00:07That's what I posted.
00:09So, whatever reaction and defense, it depends on their way.
00:15I just don't think that just because we have participated in the trial,
00:20there's no prohibition.
00:22In stating without adding anything to what the law or the rules are saying.
00:31Ulitin po po, no?
00:33Claro po, sa rules of court, na yung misleading questions hindi po allowed.
00:40So, kung makikita nyo sa four corners ng post book, no?
00:45Wala doon?
00:46It doesn't add anything other than ano yung nakasulat sa rules of court.
00:54But do you agree with the defense counsel's position na yung spagkakasabi ng it is allowed
01:00was not allegedly referring to the misleading statement?
01:04That's the time, but I will not comment on that.
01:06You know, I think I am wise enough to know if ever I am about to cross the line.
01:13So, I will ulitin po, no?
01:14Yung four corners ng post book, it is a statement na alam ng lahat ng law student at saka lahat
01:24ng abogado.
01:25Hindi po po pwede yung misleading questions kahit saan, kahit kailan,
01:34pagbalik-balik na rin man yung isang bukuman.
01:38Hindi po po pwede yung misleading questions.
01:41Now, kung yung depensa po, magre-reklamo, with all the respect po,
01:47kung babasahin doon, I am asking you, did I mention a name?
01:52Did I mention what case?
01:56Zero.
01:57Nothing.
01:58Nada.
01:59So, yung reaction, if they felt alluded to, saka rin na...
02:05Sir, but you believe your comment was not done in bad taste?
02:08Of course.
02:09I mean, Dwight, this is the question now.
02:12If you pose something like, due process is found in the Constitution,
02:19Is there anything illegal?
02:23Just because nagpa-participate tayo sa trial,
02:27hindi po tayong pinagbabawalan to post ano yung sinasabi ng batas.
02:34So, long as hindi po tayo nagdadagdag ng pangalan, ng value, or even interpretation,
02:43I could have understood the problem.
02:48Kung sinabi ko doon, ano yung interpretation ko sa batas?
02:51I didn't interpret anything.
02:53Pero yung time niya, Tony?
02:54Okay.
02:55Yun na yun.
02:56Yung time niya sa...
02:57I mean, I could pose that anytime.
03:00You know what I mean?
03:01You know what I mean?
03:02I could pose it anytime.
03:03Ulitin ko po.
03:04Claro po sa rules of court.
03:06Isang bagay po.
03:07Yun po yung tinuturo po sa aking mga estudyante.
03:10So, parang sakin, by just stating ano yung nasa rules of court,
03:16Ulitin ko, without naming any person,
03:20without putting the context or hinting to that I'm alluding to anybody,
03:26with all respect ko, this is free country.
03:31Hindi po bawal mag-post on one thing.
03:36Ano yung nakasulat sa batas?
03:39Ano yung nakasulat sa rules of court?
03:43So, is the defense overreacting?
03:45Are you not pertaining talaga doon sa nangyayaring proceeding?
03:48Okay.
03:49I will not answer that question.
03:50Sir, but is the defense overreacting in your opinion?
03:52I will not answer that question.
03:54So, what do you make out of the presiding officers warning?
03:59So, I lack your personnel,
04:02but my Facebook page is still very much on.
04:10That's my Facebook page.
04:12Ulitin ko po, no?
04:13That was just a posting of what the rules are saying.
04:20Oh, yeah.
04:20Nothing more, nothing less, walang interpretation.
04:25So, kung may tinamaan bang po, sorry.
04:29Hindi niyo buburahin, hindi niyo buburahin yun po.
04:31Why would I?
04:33Buburahin ko ba?
04:34I mean, hindi po allowed ang misleading question.
04:38Hindi po, hindi ko yan buburahin.
04:40Hindi niyo buburahin.
04:42Hindi niyo buburahin.
04:43Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:01Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:01Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:02Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:03Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:07Hindi niyo buburahin.
05:09You
Comments