Skip to playerSkip to main content
Private prosecutor Atty. Lorna Kapunan requested for state auditor Xylene Mae Del Campo to appear before the clerk of the impeachment court, in order to identify and authenticate the documents submitted by the prosecution and defense panels, during the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte on Wednesday, Aug. 12.

Kapunan earlier said that the prosecution panel is "disturbed" by a manifestation made by the defense panel yesterday, stating that the markings of tabulations and summaries do not authenticate the acknowledgement receipts of the confidential funds of Duterte. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5664f6TkaeHgwBly50DWZQ/join

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews
Transcript
00:00We are disturbed, Your Honor. Although yesterday we terminated our direct examination, we are disturbed by a manifestation of counsel
00:10for the respondent when she said that the marking of the tabulations and summaries will in no way be an
00:26admission, Your Honor,
00:27as to the authenticity of the acknowledgement receipts, which form part of the tabulation and the summary, Your Honor.
00:41We therefore are constrained, unless counsel now is willing to stipulate, that the summaries and the tabulation,
00:54which was really personally prepared by this competent witness of the COA ICFAO, which office received.
01:04And all acknowledgement receipts have an attestation that they are certified through copies of the person who has custody of
01:18the same, Your Honor.
01:18May we inquire from counsel of respondent if, again, although the presiding officer did make it clear that when each
01:30individual acknowledgement receipt is presented,
01:35they have the right to cross-examine.
01:38And we have the right to ask the witness, our concern, Your Honor, is the next witnesses that we will
01:47be presenting will not have any personal knowledge of this acknowledgement receipts.
02:00They will not be able to identify and authenticate.
02:05The only person who can do that, Your Honor, is the current witness, Sailene May Del Campo.
02:12Now, we are constrained, Your Honor.
02:16To save the time of this Honorable Court, this presiding officer will recall that it also ordered, Your Honor,
02:24that the prosecution and the defense submit separately the list of documents, specifically acknowledgement receipts,
02:35to the clerk of court which office will be the one to make the comparison, Your Honor.
02:44Can we modify that order, Your Honor?
02:49Can we request, Your Honor, that in addition to the clerk of court comparing, comparing the prosecution evidence and the
03:02defense evidence,
03:04an exercise which should have been done Thursday and Friday last week, Your Honor,
03:08that instead of just doing that, that this witness appear before the clerk of court to identify and authenticate, Your
03:21Honor,
03:22these documents in front of the prosecution, in front of the defense, and in front of the clerk of court.
03:30Thereafter, the clerk of court can make a finding or report or evaluation that these documents, I'm sorry,
03:41that these documents were properly identified, authenticated by this witness, Your Honor,
03:50to preempt any technical, legal objection in the future, because, Your Honor, or in the formal offer, Your Honor,
04:00because counsel will recall, and this court will recall, that while we had already ended our direct examination,
04:09counsel for respondents said, that does not mean that this witness identified and authenticated the acknowledgement receipts.
04:21And therefore, Your Honor, if we may respectfully request the presiding officer to authorize or to designate the clerk of
04:33court
04:38to accept, Your Honor, not only the documents, but likewise, for this witness to appear before the clerk of court
04:47in front of counsels
04:49for both respondent and the prosecution to enable this witness to identify and authenticate based on personal knowledge,
05:03knowledge, Your Honor, the documents that are part of the summaries, Your Honor.
05:09This way, Your Honor, we will not have to present again acknowledgement receipts this morning and identify each and every
05:18one.
05:20So, in sum, Your Honor, my manifestation is to the effect that we expand the directive of the presiding officer
05:34directing the parties to separately submit their documents and for the clerk of court's office to itself to make the
05:47comparison.
05:48We want to expand it to include that this witness, Ms. Seilin, appear before the clerk of court
05:58in the presence of the court in the presence of counsels for the petitioner and for the respondent for the
06:06purpose of, one, identifying,
06:10and, two, authenticating the documents in the tabulation, Your Honor.
06:15This will save the court two hours today.
06:29Remember Black asking for more information from you to resume today.
06:29It is available for the citation, yes yes, yes, yes, well-made, but if the 캠ting office file,
06:30files of counsels for questions, provide Sekoufax and Krystal Macron send it to the advert가지고
06:32and one, 디저 will even ask you some information from the ma computation that you have seen.
06:32So in verse 15, I'm excuse so, the서vick revealed.
06:32So now what's the result?
Comments

Recommended