00:00May I just respond to this, Yolana?
00:02I will respond to her.
00:05As to you, Attorney Kapunan.
00:09The chair did make a issue and order for the parties to try to meet Friday or Thursday.
00:16However, for whatever reason, lack of lawyers or inclement weather, that did not happen.
00:22Chair, we'd just like to correct.
00:23You're not, Attorney Lorna, inindyan.
00:26Maybe you're going to host.
00:37But having said that, the chair notes, because the chair also inquired, that given what happened in the pre-trial,
00:48wherein the copies of the exhibits marked by the respondent,
00:54no copies were retained by the court.
00:59So the chair would like to request the counsels for respondent to kindly furnish the court
01:04with a copy of the marked pieces of evidence during pre-trial.
01:10Because apparently, we have pre-marked pieces of evidence from the prosecution,
01:17but not all the pre-marked pieces of evidence from the respondent.
01:21So in lieu of meeting, kindly just submit that, Attorney Christine,
01:25so that we can do the comparison ourselves, either as a court or through the individual senator judges.
01:34We will comply, Your Honor.
01:36Kindly do that within the day or at the latest tomorrow, if you have it with you, within the day,
01:41if not at the latest tomorrow, so that whatever may happen,
01:44the court will already have a copy of these pre-marked documents.
01:47In relation to Ms. Eileen, as stated by Attorney Christine already,
01:52they will not object to the presentation of a table and their summary citing Rule 130, Section 7 in relation
01:58to 3C.
01:59Therefore, we may proceed with her and hopefully be able to finish also Ms. Pareja today.
02:06Counsel?
Comments