Skip to playerSkip to main content
On Tuesday, August 11, defense lawyer Kristine Ferrer told the impeachment court that comparing the exhibits is not necessary. She explained that the court can decide whether the acknowledgment receipts are genuine and admissible as evidence. Ferrer also questioned the COA witness's competence to identify the documents, saying the defense did not stipulate to her ability to do so and was unsure of the extent of her examination of the exhibits. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! -
https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#VPSaraOnTrial
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews
Transcript
00:00Yes, Your Honor, please. I would like to thank the Good Counsel for their willingness to explore or to implement
00:09Rule 130, Section 7. At least we have aligned with what we are expected to do before this Honorable Court.
00:17In fact, Your Honor, earlier this morning, I was asked by one of her partners about the comparison. And I
00:26actually told her partner, Attorney Lazaro, attorney, we don't even need to compare the exhibits in order to expedite the
00:34proceedings.
00:35Because, first of all, the authenticity of the exhibits is something that the court will have to decide. And the
00:46court will only decide on that after the prosecution has already submitted their offer of evidence. And that will be
00:52subject to our comment.
00:53And there's no need for us to actually compare the exhibits just so we can arrive at a stipulation that
01:02this and that are the same. And also, Your Honor, with regard to the identification of the witness of the
01:11exhibits, that goes into the witness competence.
01:14Now, we did not stipulate here in open court that the witness is competent to identify the exhibits, Your Honor,
01:22kasi hindi naman ho namin kilala ho yung taga-coa.
01:25Pangalawa, we don't know the extent of her examination of the documents. Pangatlo, she just assumed the work of Mr.
01:35Wamil.
01:35So, mahirap naman po sabihin nun ang kliente namin, sige, okay na, payag na kami, she can identify the exhibits,
01:42she knows all of those, she has examined all of those.
01:44Precisely, that's the duty of the counsel to do in open court. Now, there's Rule 130, Section 7, and for
01:52those of you who are litigating before the CTA, you already know this rule,
01:56that a witness can testify based on a summary, and that would actually show that he's competent to testify on
02:06the exhibits by reason of the summary that she made.
02:08And that would attest that she has examined all of the documents that are contained in the summary.
02:15That's why, yun po yung sinagest ko sa counsel ng Kabila, sabi ko, we don't even, we will not even
02:20object, attorney, as to how many exhibits you will identify,
02:24or you will have a sample, kahit sampo per quarter, or kahit 100, or kahit wala.
02:29Diba? If you check Rule 130, Section 7, hindi naman ho nirequire na isa-isahin ho yun.
02:35At hindi ho nirequire, your honor, na kailangan ho namin mag-stipulate on the exhibits, on the authenticity, so that
02:42they can use Rule 130, Section 7.
02:45And if properly done po, your honor, I think they can identify or they can finish all one quarter in
02:52less than 10 minutes.
02:54I'm talking about that, no? I'm talking about that based on experience.
02:59So, your honor, we don't object to their implementation of Rule 130, Section 7, as to the manner, by how
03:08they will do it.
03:08We will also not object, but subject to cross-examination, your honor. Thank you.
Comments

Recommended