Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00It was a bad decision. They shouldn't even be reviewing these things on slow motion, right?
00:03It should be reviewed in live action. I think it was the right decision to reverse it.
00:07And if you're Belgian, why would you want to play a game, a win, a match, and then you win
00:11this match,
00:11and then everyone will argue you didn't really win it because their leading score was not on the pitch during
00:17the match.
00:18So it's kind of unusual because, generally speaking, I mean, if you're playing, you want the other side to be
00:23at its best
00:24so that your victory is not tainted in that way.
00:26So I think it was the right decision. Obviously, there's a lot of drama around it and so forth.
00:30But I think it was the right decision to reverse it because that decision initially, from everyone I've heard,
00:35I'm not an expert, you know, I don't claim to be an expert on soccer, but from everyone I've heard
00:42that knows about this,
00:43that they all say that that, you know, the guy's head wasn't even looking down.
00:46It wasn't like he knew where he was stepping.
00:48So look, maybe turning into an international incident, I don't know, maybe we'll bring it up at NATO tomorrow
00:53or we're there with the Belgians and everybody else, but I just hope the match will go on,
00:56everyone will be at full strength, and the winner will be the winner.
00:59And that is, Belgians, they have a very good team.
01:01You know, they'll move on and they can say they beat the U.S. at full strength at home.
01:04You know, they can say they beat the U.S. at full strength at home.
Comments

Recommended