00:00Yung relevance ng testimony ng at least 8, and then number 2, I would say that the testimonies of the
00:06PC are credible.
00:08Well, you know, the investigators seem to find those narration of facts as it relates to the money being delivered
00:16to the former speaker and to Zalvi,
00:20categorical and consistent, as to those facts.
00:23But as for the rest, hindi pa namin muna, we will not focus on that.
00:30What we are focusing on and what seems to be categorical and consistent are those statements as it relates to
00:38the money being delivered to Zalvi and the former speaker.
00:41You don't want to use the word credible because maybe paying weight man in terms of revenue is credible?
00:46Yes, of course, that is for the courts to decide.
00:49And for us naman, we are looking at the individual statements and we look at their consistency.
01:00Of course, the investigators have been able to study siguro the body language, the demeanor of the affiance, and they
01:11are of the opinion that we can use it.
01:14So, sa amin lang, sana mag-girmahan na, sana magamit na namin para sa kaso, para sumulong or isulong na
01:22namin yung kaso.
01:34You
Comments